An alternative to read the intervention in Social Work

Abstract

This article is been of constructions elaborated in the investigation “Intervention of Social Work in the fields Community, Human rights and Environment “. Responds to the ethical, political and academic commitment of contributing to the construction of knowledge in the Social Work. On the matter, diverse efforts are dispersed, not carried out systematically; in consequence, the production, foundation, investigation and intervention are affected: “To speak of challenges makes reference to a battle field that it harbors reflection: therefore, a field in construction; implies to abandon (or at least to re-think) that given, that instituted” (Puebla, 2002). The article materializes a bet for the writing, to consolidate and to sum up knowledge on how to read the fields of intervention of the Social Work. The reflection is centered in outlining approaches to keep in mind when making the reading to the intervention of the profession; visibility to elements that have raised discussions in the profession and in those that an enough precision has not been given, around incognito as: what are we? (Do I work Social as profession-discipline), how to understand the intervention? (Components and Conditions), from where to read it? (construccionism, complexity, critic) and how to define the intervention space? (Field)